Sacked NUS President defies discrimination, defends right to speak for Palestine
Shaima Dallali, sacked from her role as President of the National Union of Students, has rejected the allegations of antisemitism hurled at her and is considering “all available legal remedies” to challenge her dismissal. Lawyers Carter Ruck said in a statement the process to which Ms Dallali has been subjected constitutes “discriminatory treatment of her as a Black Muslim woman and her beliefs concerning the plight of the Palestinian people.”
Pro-Palestinian organisations have rallied to defend her, challenging the NUS for bowing to pressure from the pro-Israel Union of Jewish Students. We reproduce below a statement from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and five other groups saying:
“This is not the first time a Muslim woman of colour has had her social media trawled, her internet presence scrutinised, and her ability to do her elected role obstructed by a media-stoked outrage that ends up conflating legitimate criticisms of Israel with antisemitism.”
The announcement from the NUS, also reproduced below, shows no concern for the harm Shaima has suffered. In promising “to work closely with the Union of Jewish Students to build trust and confidence with Jewish students”, it is grossly insensitive to the many students, Black, Muslim, Jewish and others, who may not share the UJS’s particular views.
Read the statement of support for Ms Dallali on the PSC website.
Read the NUS statement on their website.
Click on the image to read the press release from Ms Dallali’s lawyers.
The Palestine Solidarity Campaign has issued the following statement alongside British Palestinian Committee, Diaspora Alliance, European Legal Support Centre, Muslim Association of Britain, Palestinian Forum in Britain
We are dismayed to see that the NUS’ investigation into their elected president, Shaima Dallali, has been allowed to reach this conclusion.
The disciplinary investigation into Ms. Dallali was triggered after pressure from the Government and the Union of Jewish Students (UJS) which led to a wider investigation into antisemitism within the NUS. We, amongst a range of legal, community, student and rights organisations have raised questions about the credibility of this process as a genuine anti-racist exercise. The dismissal of Ms. Dallali, and the discrimination which we consider that she has been subjected to, only exacerbates these concerns. We understand that Ms. Dallali is considering her right to appeal the dismissal and to bring Tribunal proceedings over the NUS’ treatment and dismissal of her.
We recognise the considerable political pressure put on the NUS to initiate and reach ‘the right result’ in these two investigatory processes. However, in bowing to this pressure, the NUS has undermined its own commitment to anti-racism, including the fight against antisemitism, and has abandoned its duty of care to its elected President. Ms. Dallali has been subjected to the most intense public scrutiny and horrifying abuse, including death threats. This is not the first time a Muslim woman of colour has had her social media trawled, her internet presence scrutinised, and her ability to do her elected role obstructed by a media-stoked outrage that ends up conflating legitimate criticisms of Israel with antisemitism. Unfortunately for Ms. Dallali, her grave concerns over her safety have been completely side-lined.
The refusal to accept Ms. Dallali’s unreserved apology for one tweet from a decade ago when she was a teenager, while publicising a number of spurious allegations around her support for Palestinian rights, speaks volumes about the nature of the NUS’ investigation. The fact that the decision to dismiss Ms. Dallali was leaked and published in the Jewish News and the Jewish Chronicle, and reportedly shared with the Government and the Leader of the Opposition, before she had even been notified, is wholly inappropriate and beggars belief.
From the outset of the dual investigations, we raised fundamental concerns about the framework for investigation and the failure to acknowledge how conflation of antisemitism with legitimate critique of Israeli oppression has been utilised to silence Palestinians and those who support their rights. The inclusion, for example, amongst the published allegations against Ms. Dallali, that she had tweeted ‘from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ and had participated in a protest at KCL against the presence on campus of a former Deputy Prime Minister of Israel, made clear a failure from the outset to distinguish between genuine antisemitism and legitimate advocacy for the rights of Palestinians.
We have also raised concerns about the disproportionate involvement of the UJS, who were given significant authority in the framing of the investigation and the appointment of the Independent Investigator. Whilst we recognise the need for the NUS to consult with a body representing Jewish students in addressing concerns about antisemitism, the degree of prioritisation of a single interested party violates due process.
It also fails to take into account the role the UJS has played in the conflation of antisemitism and legitimate critique of Israel’s oppression of the Palestinian people, including promoting resources which suggest that it is inherently antisemitic to advocate for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel or to describe Israel as a state practising the crime of apartheid.
In this regard we note that the formal disciplinary process against Ms. Dallali was, in part, triggered by her public statements criticising Israel for its discriminatory laws and policies, and her calling out of the UJS on social media, prior to being elected president, for its evidenced activities aiming to silence advocacy for Palestinian rights. It is deeply concerning that criticism of the UJS for its overtly political pro-Israel advocacy has been reframed as evidence of hostility to all Jewish students, and thereby seen as grounds for dismissal.
Whilst we await the report into the broader investigation, Ms. Dallali’s dismissal renews our deep concerns that its likely outcome, rather than combatting the very real problem of antisemitism, will instead contribute to anti-Palestinian racism and the silencing of legitimate advocacy for Palestine.
In responding to this situation in this manner, we believe the NUS has made a series of misjudgments and reached an outcome that does precisely the opposite of its purported aim. It needs to embark on the significant task facing it to repair the damage done by this investigation and rebuild trust with students who are doing crucial anti-racism work, including those advocating for Palestinian rights and working to combat Islamophobia and antisemitism.
On Tuesday 1st November, NUS issued this statement “in response to information appearing online relating to the investigation.”
Following the independent KC-led investigation into allegations of antisemitism, specifically into the then President Elect under the NUS Code of Conduct, an independent panel has found that significant breaches of NUS’ policies have taken place. As per this finding, we have terminated the President’s contract. The decision of the panel may be subject to an appeal. In strict accordance with rules around employees and confidentiality, we will not be sharing any further details on the investigation into the President. We can assure any interested parties that this process has been incredibly robust and that we can and must trust in the outcome.
We know that there will be strong feelings around this issue so we urge people to respect this process and to refrain from taking part in or perpetuating any abuse, particularly online, towards anyone involved in this matter.
Chloe Field, VP of Higher Education will step up as acting chair of the NUS UK Board and will focus on helping students through the cost-of-living crisis. We continue to work closely with the Union of Jewish Students on the wider investigation into the allegations about NUS and are exploring actions that NUS can take in the near future to build trust and confidence with Jewish students. We are sorry for the harm that has been caused and we hope to rebuild the NUS in an inclusive way – fighting for all students as we have done for the past 100 years.
Chloe Field, NUS VP Higher Education said:
“As the cost of living crisis continues to bite, I will continue to hold the government to account and push for greater support for students. As students and apprentices reach breaking point, at NUS we have developed a series of clear recommendations for the government and education institutions to ease the burden on students, and I look forward to championing them during my time at NUS.
I am proud to fight on behalf of all of our students and therefore I am determined to work together with the Union of Jewish Students to re-establish trust in our organisation and tackle some of the biggest issues facing students right now.”
In relation to the second part of the investigation, Ms Tuck KC will complete her investigatory interviews by 4th November, and will provide her report to the NUS by the end of the year.
Kat Stark,
NUS UK Director

I just did a search on the Jewish Chronicle’s website re ‘NUS’ for the current year, and 36 results/articles came up, starting with the latest and working back chronologically, the last of which – published on Feb 17 was headlined 'Fury as NUS backs ‘Israel Apartheid Week’'.
Yep, it's the old black propagandist chestnut 'fury', which the JC so often uses in its headlines, as they do 'outrage' – ie outrage at this, and outrage at that!
Anyway, out of the 36 results/articles that came up, at least fifteen of them are about Shaima Dallali. and as we all know, repetition is a key technique of propagandists – ie a subtle form of brain-washing people into believing what you want them to believe. But I HAVE to mention one of the articles that came up in the results! The article is entitled/headlined: 'Why are Jews left to fight antisemitism alone?'. Yes, apart from the tens of thousands of newspaper articles and TV news items about (alleged) anti-semitism in the Labour Party during the course of the past seven years, there's been absolutely nothing.
https://www.thejc.com/lets-talk/all/why-are-jews-left-to-fight-antisemitism-alone-bLjxQo2HDQuW6wT5iXJMZ
PS And radio news items of course!
This is a shocking capitulation to an Israel funded lobby group, the Union of Jewish Students as well as an act of racial and political discrimination in itself.
An utter act of political cowardice by NUS as well as undemocratic as Shaima is the elected President. We all know that UJS is not concerned about anti-Semitism but anti-Zionism.
I suggest that a demonstration should be organised against NUS’s racist behaviour outside its HQ in Endsleigh Street
It’s staggering that the Israel lobby has any traction at all against women-of-colour, Muslim or not. Back around 2014/15 when these pro-Israel moral panics were getting into gear, NUS President Malia Bouattia, Naz Shah MP and activist Jackie Walker were targeted.
Because of the news blackout of criticism of apartheid Israel, nobody discussed what women-of-colour would be risking there, if mistaken for Palestinian women or even Black Jewish women.
Around this time Bar-Ilan university Lecturer and former IDF Intelligence officer Mordechai Kedar suggested that raping the wives and mothers of those who took up arms against Israel, would probably act as a deterrent.
The IDF and its veterans had a habit of wearing t-shirts with an image of a pregnant Arab woman in sniper telescopic sights, captioned ‘one shot two kills’. Basically, they were joking about shooting Palestinian women in the womb, to get the unborn child too.
And Israel’s own media has admitted to subjecting Black Jewish Women to ‘forced contraception injections’. This according to Haaretz, The Times of Israel etc has suppressed Black Jewish reproduction by up to 50%.
That any woman-of-colour should be required to defend herself against representatives of this culture is appalling.
Some links
Black Jews forced contraception
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2013-01-27/ty-article/.premium/ethiopians-fooled-into-birth-control/0000017f-f512-d044-adff-f7fb92c30000
&
https://newspunch.com/israel-admits-forcing-birth-control-on-ethiopian-jews/
&
https://www.timesofisrael.com/ethiopian-women-claim-israel-forced-them-to-use-birth-control-before-letting-them-immigrate/
&
https://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/israel_admits_ethiopian_jewish_immigrants_were_given_birth_control_shots/
Mordechai Kedar – Rape
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/israeli-professor-rape-hamas-militiants-mothers-sisters-deter-terrorist-attacks-1457836
T-Shirt Pregnant women images
https://www.google.com/search?q=one+shot+two+kills+idf+t-shirt&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi269LJqpP7AhXKTcAKHZgfBhEQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1366&bih=615&dpr=1
I used to be a Vice President of the National Union of Students. I was elected to that position. I don’t understand how the Presidents ‘contract’ can be terminated’. Surely there should be a vote of ‘no confidence’ and then an enforced resignation. I assume the structure has changed. But it is clear now that ANY criticism of Israel especially by someone who is a Muslim is seen as antisemitism. People have to fight this and use it as a vehicle for debating this key issue.
Can we please actually see the statements that were considered antisemitic? Is ‘For the river to the sea’… the only one? I fully support Shaima Dallali and think that her removal is a terrible crushing of student democracy; following on the hounding of Malia Bouattia (who I met at the Holocaust Memorial Day events accompanied by mutual Jewish friends. ) But I would be glad to see the words whih are now considered to be offensive.
I. along with a very large number of other Jews, am deeply angered that the Israeli lobby has been allowed to dominate the public debate on the issue of anti-semitism to the point where no other voice, Jewish or otherwise, is allowed to be heard and any-one who dissents from the Israeli view who tries to make their voice heard must face insult, abuse and slander. What needs to be done to effectively counter this fundamental and concerted attack, not only on the supporters of Palestinan human rights, but on the very idea of democratic debate?
I was just doing some research about the Oxford University Labour Club episode and, as such, came across the following article by Asa Winstanley from the 24th of August, 2020:
‘This is the bogus anti-Semitism report that sank Jeremy Corbyn’
The road to Jeremy Corbyn’s political downfall began at Oxford University Labour Club in February 2016.
A rogue inquiry by a Labour staffer with close ties to the Israeli embassy included fabricated allegations of anti-Semitism.
It destroyed the lives of several pro-Corbyn students sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.
It also triggered Labour’s “anti-Semitism crisis” in earnest. The manufactured crisis continues today, even with Corbyn now marginalized.
After an internal Labour disciplinary investigation, some of the accused were cleared of anti-Semitism the following year.
But by that time the damage had been done.
After a four-year investigation, The Electronic Intifada has obtained the full Rubin report, which has never been published.
Michael Rubin, who wrote it, was chair of the right-wing group Labour Students. But the “inquiry” was his own initiative and had not been mandated by either Labour’s leader or its ruling National Executive Committee.
Rubin was also collaborating with Shai Masot, an Israeli “diplomat” who would be kicked out of the UK the following year.
In a blog on JLMs website posted in May 2016, Jan (Baroness) Royale begins by saying the following:
Antisemitism is abhorrent and the values of our movement mean that it cannot and must not be tolerated. That was the starting point for my inquiry. Labour has a proud record of tolerance, antiracism and of standing up for minorities, and our Leader has been at the forefront of many of the struggles for the dignity of all peoples.
Well, exactly, and it’s very sad that after decades of fighting and campaigning against intolerance and racism and anti-semitism etc he should turn into a bigoted, Jew-hating anti-semite.
Courtesy of the JLM and CAA and LFI and BoD and Blairites and Jewish newspapers and the MSM et al. And I have a sneaky feeling that MI5 had a hand in the ‘transformation’ of Jeremy, and the left in general !
https://web.archive.org/web/20161024055526/http://www.jlm.org.uk/blog_baroness_royal_on_her_report_there_is_too_often_a_culture_of_intolerance_where_jews_are_concerned_and_there_are_clear_incidents_of_antisemitism
NB Asa Winstanley posted a link to the above in the following article about the OULC episode:
Instigator of anti-Semitism scam kicked out of Labour
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/instigator-anti-semitism-scam-kicked-out-labour
Anyone know what she was supposed to have said and in what context?
Was it so dangerous nobody is allowed to know?
Here we go again .All the old tired tropes .The Israel / Zionist lobby controls the world .The defenders of this young woman must dip into the Protocols of the Elders of Zion for their inspiration.
My late father in law ,who was an academic at a German university in 1933 ,heard exactly the same accusations made against the German Jewish sudents associaion.
With all due respect to Monty Jochelson (no I don’t tend to use my academic title on comment pages either).
It would have been hard for his late father law to hear accusations that Israel controls the world in 1933 given that the country was not yet in existence.
What he would have been hearing is Nazi claims of a ‘Jewish Global Conspiracy’ this would have applied to all Jews regardless or not, of whether they supported getting into the white colonial gravy-train.
Actually while Jews of all orientations were fighting increasing Nazi anti-Semitism, Zionists were writing the following ingratiating racial ‘purity’ correspondence to the Nazis. – as Leni Brunner notes (thanks to Max Blumenthal)
On June 21, 1933, the Zionistische Vereinigung fur Deutschland, the German Zionist Federation, appealed to the Nazis:
“May we, therefore, be permitted to present our views, which, in our opinion, make possible a solution in keeping with the principles of the new German State of National Awakening…. because we, too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish group…
For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration even of a government fundamentally hostile to Jews…. Boycott propaganda – such as is currently being carried on against Germany in many ways – is in essence un-Zionist, because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build.”
https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/24/zionism-in-the-age-of-the-dictators/
With apolgues to Gavin Lewis ,I will follow the Australian practice of using first names
Here we go again . What a lazy way of equating Zionism with Nazism.In 1933 the Jews of Germany faced a very uncertain future .One option was emigration to any country that would accept them.Unless you were wealthy or were an accomplished academic ,sportsman or musician no country would allow you in.
Zionism was another option.I think it reprehensible for Gavin to take a quote out of context to make the tired old equation
Zionism =Nazism