The EHRC Report – critical evaluations / 4
Published
by
Richard Kuper
JVL Introduction
Many interesting analyses of the EHRC Report are being produced and we will be reposting a selection.
Doing so does not imply that we endorse all the points made in these analyses but, in our view, all add important insights.
The fourth reposting is a statement from the recently formed Truth Defence, “a group of activists and professionals seeking to promote a culture of honesty and integrity at the heart of public life.“
This article was originally published by Truth Defence on Thu 29 Oct 2020. Read the original here.
TRUTH DEFENCE: statement on EHRC Report
The EHRC’s investigation into anti-Semitism in the Labour Party failed to consider vital evidence it was made aware of. Truth Defence is supporting a group of Jewish members of the party – including Truth Defence directors and co-founders Justin Schlosberg and Andrew Feinstein – who are seeking to mount a legal challenge the EHRC’s ruling.
Loading article text…
Kol hakavod (Hebrew phrase meaning literally “all the honour”) to the authors of this article, whose names suggest that they are from Jewish families, for continuing to argue for a balanced consideration of all the evidence. They will either be decried as traitors and anti-semites, or — much more likely — ignored and silenced. Now more than ever, the reporting of this whole affair seeks to suppress any dissenting Jewish voices.
Important service from Truth Defence.
Malicious claims of anti-semitism shame the memory of the victims of the Shoah.
Thank you, Richard Samson. Your comment, “Malicious claims of anti-semitism shame the memory of the victims of the Shoah”, should be the main slogan of the campaign to withdraw the suspension of Jeremy Corbyn.
You have the best wishes of all fair minded Labour members and millions of supporters who just want to have their day in court
JVL saved my sanity, good luck and kind regards to Truth Defence