How top Labour officials plotted to bring down Jeremy Corbyn
JVL Introduction
Jonathan Cook gives a very helpful overall summary of the leaked internal Labour Party Report and puts it into context.
He expresses his fears that those who leaked the report will be blamed while the astonishing revelations are glossed over. For to deal with them properly would have to include looking again at accusations of antisemitism and the clear, consistent evidence of how these were weaponised.
In the effort to avoid this, the likely casualties, he believes, are truth and transparency.
This article was originally published by Middle East Eye/jonathan-cook.net on Thu 16 Apr 2020. Read the original here.
How top Labour officials plotted to bring down Jeremy Corbyn
Loading article text…
This is even more serious than the Blairite personalities involved. The management structure of the Labour Party allowed officials to work against the wishes of the elected leader. If Labour can’t create an effective chain of command, what hope is there that an incoming Labour government will be able to effectively implement radical policies in the teeth of opposition from Britain’s class of senior managers? As our Universities amply demonstrate, there is no point in owning an asset if you don’t control it. Britain’s senior managers will oppose radical change. How does an incoming Labour Government overcome that when it seems incapable of setting its own house in order ?
Is radical change an impossible dream ?
Please why are no names published? I need to know who these people are so I can see if i will be voting labour again. Print their names but openly say “they” are the cause of jeramy losing.
Jonathan Cook refers to Chris Williamson being denounced as an antisemitism denier; the report’s lengthy justification of its dsciplinary action invites incredulity.
However, the ‘denialism’ section gives perhaps the most direct comment on the situation regarding Labour’s antisemitism: “as both Jeremy Corbyn and Jenny Formby have stated on a number of occasions, and this investigation extensively documents, the antisemitism problem is real. A small number of Labour members hold antisemitic views, including some which are very extreme in nature. Moreover, there is a wider lack of wider understanding about antisemitism, which means that many members cannot recognise as antisemitism what Jewish members highlight.” We may assume that “Jewish members” refers to Jewish Labour Movement, as one of their officers is quoted in an earlier paragraph. After listing cases where “denialism narratives have clear antisemitic and conspiratorial undertones” the writers add: “Moreover, minimisation of the issue or dismissal of the concerns expressed by Jewish members can seem to be part of the same package as denialism which has antisemitic undertones; all ‘denialism’ can appear antisemitic.”
Keir Starmer may find in the statement above a way to fulfil his pledges to the Board of Deputies and its prime agent Jewish Labour Movement. He may choose to address the concerns of these Jewish members by granting the right to define what is ‘denialism’ and what is antisemitism in the Labour Party.
The stench of coverup, is indeed in the air. I urge all members, who wish to see a fairer more caring Britain, led by a party for decency, to scrutinise how this is dealt with!
Surely the most important issue is that there was a organised attempt by the General secretary and his office to undermine the elected leader of the Labour Party. This raises the question of party loyalty. If party funds were inappropiatly used to bolster prefered candidate’s of the general secretary office knowing these candidates were opposed to the leader, does that imply they were also part of the conspiracy to overthrow the elected leader. There is so much in this leaked report. They were obviously racist by the E-mail comments. Their singling out of Diane Abbott can only be described as vile. In fact they stood for everything Labour was against .
Completely agree, Paul Roberts. The main questions are about party disloyalty, how funds were misspent, and why were these people are not suspended now for racism?
I have been in the Labour Party for some thirty years. I have never observed racism or anti-semitism within our Party. Our British Jewish CLP members have not observed it.
We think that exaggerated or false claims of anti-semitism in the Labour Party have been used to restrict criticism of the extremist and racist Israeli government and to unfairly attack Jeremy Corbyn and other Socialists over.
Jonathan Cook has written an excellent summary of what has been going on within our Labour Party. A number of bad events in recent times, which I have been aware of, are explained by the further revelations.
Thank you Jonathan. I write as one of the 130 cases of antisemitism that remain unresolved. I am completely innocent of anti-semitism but a critic of Israeli policy towards the Palestinians. The person who accused me listened to me for barely a minute before flouncing out of a meeting and then trying to get me suspended. My case has now been ongoing for 13 months. Despite letters to Disputes, no reply. What I am puzzled by and would appreciate hugely is if someone could shed light on the connection between my case and the overarching background of Senior Management trying to blacken Corbyn’s name? I am simply a truthful and passionate supporter of telling the truth about Palestine. Is that it? As simple as that?
All I can say , that reading this made me want to cry. How Jeremy remained standing I do not know. How did he not have a breakdown after all the lies they were throwing at him? I’m disgusted and am on the edge of cancelling my membership.
(To Susie Greaves, in sympathy and solidarity)
The final paragraph of the report may offer a clue to your continuing suspension: “Our overriding objective…is to eradicate the virus of antisemitism from our Party and make the Party a safe and welcoming home for Jewish members.”
The ‘virus’ analogy suggests a message on the lines of: “You may have the virus of antisemitism without knowing it; you must be kept in isolation until all testing proves negative; if the result is positive, the treatment you receive will make vulnerable Jewish members feel safer.”