Labour HQ shenanigans again
Published
by
Richard Kuper
JVL Introduction
It’s hard to believe the mixture of bungling incompetence and factional manoeuvring that characterises the Labour Party machine.
This report by Skwawkbox exposes it in all its glory.
Audrey White’s case may seem extreme, but from the various reports and correspondence we have seen it is all too typical of the high-and-mighty contempt that so many on the left have been subjected to in recent years.
It’s way beyond time to cleanse Labour’s Augean stables.
This article was originally published by Skwawkbox on Wed 17 Aug 2022. Read the original here.
Exclusive: letter and lawyer’s analysis exposes nonsense of claim Labour expelled White and forgot
Merseyside activist expelled after political humiliation of Starmer – but party claimed she had been expelled six months earlier but that it had forgotten to tell her
Loading article text…
The GLU and the Labour Party have not lost their power to shock.
Absolutely disgraceful Labour Party system worthy of a Stalinist purge and trail along with a deliberate policy of ignoring the outcome of the forde report with out the truth there is and can not be democracy with in Labour Party devoid of socialist principles
I found this very interesting for personal reasons. I received my expusion letter in December 2021. I immediately appealed. I never received a receipt or acknowledgement of my appeal letter and to date the LP has not replied to 2 letters I sent demanding a result re my appeal. I then wrote a formal letter of complaint citing the GLU. I’ve never received any reply from the Labour Party.
Meanwhile my CLP received a post cyber attack membership list from HQ ( as a CLP for members abroad we are not entitled to use Organise for “data protection reasonsW” so we have to make do with a membership list sent directly by LP HQ on a regular basis. The CLP exec membership secretary (also my branch Sec) saw that my name had reappeared on the CLP membership list, without even a flag against it.
Have I been reinstated and they forgot to tell me? I’ve spent the last 8 months with an identity crisis!
The incompetence and corruption of the Tory Party is only exceeded by the same traits within the Labour Party. The people of the UK will suffer until these poisons are rooted out, exposed to every member of society for all to witness the people responsible humiliated and banished.
Sadly, the Labour Party organisation, its senior staff and most of the Parliamentary Labour Party, including its wretched so-called Leader, are only self-interested, are indeed grossly incompetent, are disingenuous through to regularly being untruthful, are malicious, are full of dirty tricks and are totally unfit for their purpose of being a useful part of a democratic socialist party.
It really wouldn’t surprise me that in the hours after Audrey confronted Starmer, LP apparatchiks and Lee Harpin contrived the whole episode between them!
These people just lurve concocting scenarios that highly amuses them. And their ‘followers’!
And you can be absolutely certain that every single journalist and columnist (and their editors) who conspired in the black op smear campaign against Jeremy, know that this is just Starmer and Co having fun and playing games, but they won’t of course be crying foul and condemning them, whereas if something similar had happened when JC was leader (in relation to a ‘moderate’), it would have been headline news and people screaming blue murder.
If I’m right – and I have little doubt that I am – then if those involved were put in a position where they had to explain themselves and what happened, then Harpin would say that he thought Audrey White HAD been expelled (when he wrote his article), and the LP staffer who discovered that she HAD been expelled back in February, would say that the reason they thought to check AWs status was because of what Lee Harpin said in his article (about her having been expelled) – ie that THAT is what PROMPTED him or her to check AWs status.
The thing is this though, that if Audrey took the matter to court, then not only would any judge on the planet think it all highly improbable (and that it should all happen in the days after Audrey confronted Starmer), but the panel members who supposedly expelled her would be forced to come to court and, as such, swear that they did expel her in the February, so to speak, and if it’s all a Big Lie and never happened, then who would be willing to do that.
And the judge could ALSO ask the LP how many OTHER times such a thing has happened before, or if this is the first time it’s happened. AND also ask them precisely what the admin error was!
Waiting for the ‘We reinstated her but we forgot’ wriggle.
This seems to show the ‘undue influence ‘ of Lee Harpic? Who is he and by what right is he given privileged information by Labour Party Staff?
Labour still has not answered for its supposed ‘loss’ of Members’ data, nor does it respond to DPA Requests. Being 2 years over time with mine.
Solidarity to Audrey, her approach to Starmer perfectly correct, and one which many of us would like to do. As for the GLU it has corrupted its self, and is just a sledgehammer to kill of the left in the Labour Party.
Seeing the clip of Audrey White laying into KS has been one of the few bright spots of late. Terrific how it all expertly roared out despite the close attentions of a lick-spital minder.
Charlotte Peters Rock
My wait for answers re ‘Data Breach’ is under a year but still unacceptable. Three requests ignored. I want to know who authorised allowing a ‘third party’ access to member’s data without member’s permission; for what purpose was it handed over; the name of the ‘third party and are there any other ‘third parties’ in possession of member’s personal data?
The LP is obliged to reply to what are undoubtedly legitimate requests for information on what actually happened. I know of no-one who has had an apology or a real response. What a party!