Skip to content

Who’s Afraid of Zack Polanski – and Why? (2)

JVL Introduction

Zack Polanski has been interviewed by many legacy media outlets in the run up to the local, Scottish and Welsh elections; he has been harried, even his Jewish identity as well as antisemitic attacks against him sometimes dismissed, vile cartoons reminiscent of nothing so much as Der Sturmer have been published by newspapers claiming concern about antisemitism.  You could not make this up – or perhaps they can. Politicians and others have also treated Polanski disgracefully, almost contemptuously.

This blogpost is appropriately furious and highlights the hypocrisy of some of those who are hostile to Polanski and the Green Party’s increased popularity as it has become a Party openly committed to progressive, left wing ideas.  This morning he was asked on the BBC’s flagship “Today” programme how he would prevent being the next Jeremy Corbyn.  You do not have to support the Greens to recognise that Polanski is being subject to the same unjust treatment that goes way beyond robust questioning. You also do not have to support the Greens to commend Polanski on the way he has handled the barely veiled attacks.

LL

This article was originally published by Facebook - on Mon 4 May 2026. Read the original here.

Zack Polanski

Loading article text…

  • The co-ordinated hysteria directed against Polanski is in stark contrast to response to the acceptance of Reform’s donations from offshore billionaires, Labour complicity in Israel’s genocide, and the unwillingness to ever reference the activities of Labour Together and the influence of the Israeli lobby on British politics …. there is never any reference to the ownership and control of the media and the appointment of mainstream gatekeepers

    8
    0
  • “It boils their piss when they encounter Jewish people who don’t conform to their racist stereotype of how Jews should behave” Jabotinsky put it better:
    https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/r/rubinstein-herzl.html?ref=opendemocracy.net#:~:text=%22A%20nation%2C%20which%20lives%20a,the%20Hebrew%20with%20masculine%20beauty.
    “A nation, which lives a normal national life on its land,” wrote Jabotinsky, “is replete with stereotypes representing a characteristic national image.” Among the nations of the earth are types immediately recognizable as typically Russian or English or German. But, with us, continued Jabotinsky, there is no such characteristic type. “What we see around us among Jews is merely the outcome of arbitrary action perpetrated by others.” This prevalent Jew, the Yid, as he is pejoratively called by the Gentiles, does not reflect a proud national past but embodies the very negative traits from which Zionism seeks to redeem the Jews. “Only after removing the dust accumulated through two thousand years of exile, of galut, will the true, authentic Hebrew character reveal its glorious head. Only then shall we be able to say: This is a typical Hebrew, in every sense of the word.”

    …Our starting point is to take the typical Yid of today and to imagine his diametrical opposite … because the Yid is ugly, sickly, and lacks decorum, 

    Weizmann was equally scathing about the Jews with whom he rubbed shoulders in Manchester… the Jews in the Pale of Settlement millions of whom Weizmann had repeatedly claimed to ‘speak the minds of’. He was very rude in what he said about Mancunian Jews ‘of the wrong type’ Trope, anybody? That attitude came back to haunt him when as First President of the State that he, above all Zionists, created. – credit where credit is due – in Israel he found himself rubbing shoulders with ‘the wrong kind of Jews’. Whom he openly despised nearly as much as he did the ‘Arabs’. Tropes, anyone?

    4
    0

Comments are now closed.