How the UK military and intelligence establishment is working to stop Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister
JVL Introduction
Our intelligence services and the military are supposed bound by the “constitutional principle” of non-involvement in political affairs.
Are they?
Matt Kennard, head of investigations at Declassified UK, shows that an astonishing 34 national news media stories coming from such sources have been published since September 2015.
No fewer than 440 articles in the UK press in this period cast Jeremy Corbyn as a “threat to national security”
All this raise serious questions about the nature of these institutions.
You can see a list of some of the published attacks below.
This article was originally published by Daily Maverick on Wed 4 Dec 2019. Read the original here.
How the UK military and intelligence establishment is working to stop Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister
Officials in the UK military and intelligence establishment have been sources for at least 34 major national media stories that cast Jeremy Corbyn as a danger to British security, new research shows.
Loading article text…
Below is a link to show that Corbyn – along with many of the best labour left wingers – was a consistent opponent of the Stalinist regimes in Eastern Europe:
http://socialistresistance.org/tory-liars-corbyn-and-the-labour-left-opposed-the-east-european-regimes/11848
………. and a large swathe of the Parliamentary Party have fallen for the same toxic nonsense. Its a great illustration of the power of the establishment. Can you imagine if Jeremy Corbyn won the election? No doubt here is a file : “…. in the event of …. ” somewhere sitting on hard drives in important places!
The whole Establishment is geared to prevent Corbyn’s success. This includes Labour peers and MPs, Ofcom (in my personal experience) as well as the Jewish establishment of the Chief Rabbi, the Jewish Chronicle, the BoD, CST, etc., etc. in their determination to protect the state of Israel – notwithstanding its illegalities, its betrayal of human rights and racism
“He opposes Britain having nuclear defences”
British nuclear weapons have nothing to do with defence. They are about status. In October of 1946, a small Cabinet committee gave the go-ahead to the atomic weapons programme. What swung it was the contribution by Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin who had just had a row with US Secretary of State James Byrnes.
Attlee did not dare take the matter to the full Cabinet due to the strength of the opposition which was led by Chancellor Hugh Dalton.
Norman Tebbit often likes to praise the Attlee government for this decision.
But, if Norman Tebbit praises you, then it almost always means that the decision is wrong.
How does reviving and reprinting these slurs against JC help. What we need is to demolish these accusations. Please print the real event after the false one so that people can see how these are just trying to stop JC becoming PM as they are afraid he will stop the money flow they are enjoying.